The New World Order was officially initiated as of the 25th September 2015. This was the date of the UN meeting to shape and adopt the new development agenda that will build on the Millennium Development Goals (MDG's) and Agenda 21. It was also the date that global government began. In June 2015 I wrote an article entitled ‘2015 Development Agenda – The New World Order Incarnate‘. The Sustainable Development Agenda is also known as Agenda 21, which is the New World Order. The seventeen new Sustainable Development Goals have seen an end to national sovereignty and where nations will no longer exist, all states will recognize a single, global authority. World Government.
The 17 new Development Goals are outlined at the UN's Sustainable Development Goals website. On the surface it looks great, an end to poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all. With these goals being realized globally within the next 15 years.
The Pope introduced the world to the Sustainable Development Agenda at the UN. You can watch his speech here:
The speech is transcribed here.
Pastor Williams points out that the Elite are no longer relying on the statement ‘New World Order'. Pope Francis did not use this statement, but rather has pushed for scientists and journalists to contribute to the raising of awareness of political institutions and citizens of the need for a lifestyle that is sustainable on the human and ecological level, and works to ensure the full realization of each person and the authentic development of Creation. This New World Order agenda is being rolled out under Agenda 21, also known as the Sustainable Development Agenda. Since the Sustainable Development Agenda is the New World Order, we really need to investigate the meaning behind every part of the seventeen new Development Goals. In a future newsletter I will breakdown the points and their relevance to you and your family's future.
For a full rundown of Pope Francis' visit to the USA please click here.
I wrote an extensive article on who Pope Francis represents and their considerable involvement in the UN in June 2015. The article entitled: ‘Pope Francis to Visit the USA in September 2015‘.
The Pope's visit to the UN was the start of the New World Order. However, if you look back at the eight original Millennium Development Goals that were established following the Millennium Summit of the United Nations in 2000, since so many things have pushed towards a New World Order since the new millennium. Everything will change the way we live our lives forever. The next step in global government was the 2015 United Nations Climate Change Conference that ended on December 12th, 2015.
More than 190 nations are attempting to agree a new international deal to tackle climate change by cutting greenhouse gas emissions. Over 140 world leaders including Barack Obama (USA), Vladimir Putin (Russia), Xi Jinping (China) and David Cameron (UK) attended and delivered speeches alongside Prince Charles of the UK Royal Family.
The UN wanted to agree a truly universal global deal on tackling climate change, as part of efforts to prevent global warming exceeding 2C above pre-industrial levels this century. That's the level of warming beyond which some scientists agree the world is likely to see the most severe effects of climate change including extreme weather such as heatwaves, droughts and flooding. Preventing 2C-5C warming would require countries around the world to take action to limit or reduce their greenhouse gas emissions.
Here is the five-part deal that the UN wished to outline:
- National pledges to cut emissions: Most countries have already submitted pledges, known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), setting out how they plan to limit their emissions in the period after 2020.
- A long-term goal: Some sort of target for global emissions reductions that are required by 2050 or 2100, consistent with preventing 2C global warming.
- Holding countries to account: A clear framework for measuring whether countries are actually carrying out the emissions cuts they have promised.
- Increased pledges in future: A mechanism to make countries come back and agree to deeper national emissions cuts in future.
- Finance: An agreement that developed nations will help developing countries with the costs of going green, and the costs of coping with the effects of climate change.
The full I09 Paris Climate Agreement is available here. Just co clarify, the three biggest polluters, US, India and China agreed to limit warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels; the US and Europe had accepted some responsibility for damage done by climate change; developing countries had agreed to a dilution of the original climate convention, and had given way on financing, liability and the dates wheere there would have to be revisions.
Go back to Pastor Williams interview of Economic Hitman, Jonathan May. The full interview is available in high quality to watch online amongst other great work by Pastor Williams at LindseyWilliamsOnline.com. In 1986 Jonathan May exposed a 30 year plan that included the whole climate con. May mentioned a “development bank” would be established and that every nation would sign up for it.
In the I09 Paris Climate Agreement document I wish to draw your attention to Page 16: “Resolves to enhance the provision of urgent and adequate finance, technology and capacity-building support by developed country Parties in order to enhance the level of ambition of pre-2020 action by Parties, and in this regard strongly urges developed country Parties to scale up their level of financial support, with a concrete roadmap to achieve the goal of jointly providing USD 100 billion annually by 2020 for mitigation and adaptation while significantly increasing adaptation finance from current levels and to further provide appropriate technology and capacity-building support;” Page 8: Further decides that, in accordance with Article 9, paragraph 3, of the Agreement, developed countries intend to continue their existing collective mobilization goal through 2025 in the context of meaningful mitigation actions and transparency on implementation; prior to 2025 the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement shall set a new collective quantified goal from a floor of USD 100 billion per year, taking into account the needs and priorities of developing countries; “Decides that the Green Climate Fund and the Global Environment Facility, the entities entrusted with the operation of the Financial Mechanism of the Convention, as well as the Least Developed Countries Fund and the Special Climate Change Fund, administered by the Global Environment Facility, shall serve the Agreement;”
$100 BILLION A YEAR BY 2020! That is just for starters, this will increase I assure you. They need $100 billion a year to fight climate change. Is this really climate change they are fighting, or are they trying to pay for global government and their new global police force?
There is so much data available on climate change. Personally I believe the climate change agenda as part of the sustainable development agenda as the Elite have proposed through the UN is merely a way of further micro-managing humanity until we are mere drones for the Elite's use and amusement. Therefore, I thought I'd scour the internet for some snippets of information about carbon and why the Elite are using it against us:
Whilst some scientists such as eugenicist and BBC propagandist David Attenborough accept that man-made global warming is causing climate change. Since 1998, 31,000 scientists have announced that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the forseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and disruption of the Earth's climate.” Even one of the founders of Greenpeace, Dr. Patrick Moore (who has a BS in Biology and a PhD in Ecology) and has been a leader in the international environmental field for over 40 years, said “I am skeptical humans are the main cause of climate change and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told “the debate is over” and “the science is settled.”” His full article can be read here. It is such a powerful article that you need to read it to understand that current climate change science is not accepted by all environmental scientists.
In Al Gore's (climate change profiteer and oilman) environmental documentary ‘An Inconvenient Truth' a judge at the High Court in London, England ruled there were nine key scientific errors that had arisen “in the context of alarmism and exaggeration” in order to support Mr. Gore's thesis on global warming. The ruling followed an unsuccessful attempt to block the UK government's plan to screen the documentary in more than 3,500 secondary schools in England and Wales. Which, subsequently went ahead as children in my own family have been forced to watch this documentary with bias towards the theory that climate change is man-made. Our children are being taught climate change propaganda and even recently when I attended a school award ceremony a large part of the assembly was concerning energy efficiency and how the school can combat climate change. You can read about the nine key scientific errors in the documentary here. The Science and Public Policy Institute issued a detailed report on 35 lies that the movie told.
A March 2008 canvas of 51,000 Canadian scientists with the Association of Professional Engineers, Geologists and Geophysics of Alberta (APEGGA) found that although 99% of 1,077 replies believe the climate is changing, 68% disagreed with the statement that “…the debate on the scientific causes of recent climate change is settled.” Only 26% of them attributed global warming to “human activity like burning fossil fuels”. Regarding these results, APEGGA's executive director Neil Windsor, commented, “We're not surprised at all. There is no clear consensus of scientists that we know of.”
A 2009 report issued by the Polish Academy of Sciences PAN Committee of Geological Sciences, a major scientific institution in the European Union, agrees that the purported climate consensus argument is becoming increasingly untenable. It says, in part, that: “Over the past 400 thousand years – even without human intervention – the level of CO2 in the air, based on the Antarctic ice cores, has already been similar four times, and even higher than the current value. At the end of the last ice age, within a time interval of a few hundred years, the average annual temperature changed over the globe several times. In total, it has gone up by almost 10 degrees C in the northern hemisphere, and therefore the changes mentioned above were incomparably more dramatic than the changes reported today.”
There is no doubt that stratospheric geoengineering is being carried out around the world that is affecting weather. Wikipedia says this of stratospheric geoengineering: “The ability of stratospheric sulfate aerosols to create a global dimming effect has made them a possible candidate for the use in solar radiation management climate engineering projects to limit the effect and impact of climate change due to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Delivery of precursor sulfide gases such as sulfuric acid, hydrogen sulfide or sulfur dioxide by artillery, aircraft and ballons has been proposed.” the dumping of aluminium, barium and strontium all over the world. This is already being carried out and there are several websites dedicated to investigating chemtrails and other weather modification projects currently active around the world. Check out GeoEngineering Watch.
The data has been manipulated. Propagandists are pushing the Climate Change agenda on humanity. Hundreds of articles written in the last few days from around the world are warning “Earth's climate entering new ‘permanent reality' as CO2 hits new high“, “2015 to be the hottest year ever says world climate body“, “Paris last chance for world leaders to tackle climate change“, “‘Our Major Cities Will Be Submerged“, “Climate change: Past five years were warmest on record, report warns“, “Developing countries will need $270bn more to adapt to climate change – study“, “Children will bear the brunt of climate change – UNICEF report“, “Laos counts the cost of climate change: record floods, drought and landslides“, “Prince Charles: climate change may have helped cause Syrian civil war“.
Every year the planet Earth follows a pattern of seasons, spring, summer, fall and winter. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), seasons are produced due to the planets axial tilt and portions of the planet moving closer and others further away from the Sun. This alone shows the power our sun has to drastically impact on our ecosystem, weather and temperature. There are a few absolutes we should all agree on: First, without the Sun the earth would be a very cold planet. Second, if the Sun expanded or our planet was forced closer to the star, the earth would subsequently be much warmer. So undoubtedly the Sun is the most influential contributor to our planets climate.
In a recent study by the Center of Climate Research at the University of Madison, Wisconsin results revealed: The ocean stores 50 times more carbon dioxide than does the atmosphere; Much more carbon flows through the ocean than the amount produced by burning fossil fuels; An amount of carbon equal to the total amount stored in the atmosphere cycles through the ocean in about eight years.
71% of the Earth is covered with ocean water containing 50 times the amount of CO2 produced by fossil fuels. When the Earth is closer to the Sun, heat causes the ocean to evaporate and raise CO2 levels at a rapid rate. Proving man is not the key contributor of global warming. If the Sun traveled further away from the planet or became dormant (according to the Royal Astronomical Society's annual meeting in July 2015, Professor Valentina Zharkova of Northumbria University in the UK confirmed that the Sun will go into its Maunder Minimum [Grand Solar Minimum] in 15 years.), the planet would immediately get cooler. The behaviors of the Sun will dictate the temperature of all planets in our solar system, sun flairs, dormant periods will all show up in ice cores (as proven by Polish Academy of Sciences PAN Committee of Geological Sciences). Plants require CO2 to make oxygen and the dwindling oxygen levels and weather modification from stratospheric geoengineering programs are a bigger risk to humanity and our ecosystem than man made global warming. Pollution is bad for the environment, bad for humanity. However, CO2 is not the key contributor to global warming as government funded scientists and propagandists claim.
The environmental movement has been hijacked. Many people in the environmental movement are in it for the right reasons: they see the ongoing poisoning and destruction of the planet, led by corporations, and are determined to defend and speak out for the Earth. However, most have unwittingly been channeled in a direction that doesn't help the Earth, unintentionally supporting the very forces that are responsible for the pillaging of it.
By continuing to push notions that carbon dioxide is a poison, that global warming exists and all of mankind is responsible for it, that we need a worldwide carbon tax and that we require Agenda 21-style global governance, these people are unknowingly promoting the New World Order program and placing Elite controllers in power who don't care about the environment and view it merely as a resource to be exploited for profit. It has even gotten to the point where those opposing popular beliefs about climate change are being treated like criminals and there have been calls in the US for President Obama to prosecute them.
Climate change is a huge part of the globalists New World Order agenda. According to research by The Coalition Against Geoengineering the basis for the hijacked environmental movement lies within formerly secret military reports. An exerpt from the ‘1966 Report from the Iron Mountain‘ discusses how a global government could be imposed without war, and suggests the threat could instead be environmental pollution: “It may be, for instance, that gross pollution of the environment can eventually replace the possibility for mass destruction by nuclear weapons as the principal apparent threat to the survival of the species. Poisoning of the air, and of the principle sources of food and water supply, is already well advanced,…” The Club of Rome's 1991 document entitled ‘The First Global Revolution?' contains this passage: “In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill. In their totality and their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which must be confronted by everyone together … all these dangers are caused by human intervention in natural processes, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
As said above, carbon dioxide (CO2) is a nutrient. We breathe out carbon dioxide every breath, but we also take some of it in on the in breath. According to the Interplanetary Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), we are therefore poisoning ourselves every breath. Think about it, if CO2 were really a poison, why does it help plants grow so much? Why is it a key part of the fundamental equation of biology: sugar + oxygen = carbon dioxide + water + heat? How is that those in the environmental movement are ignorant of basic biology?
We are carbon based lifeforms? Is this a war on humanity? The more CO2 you have the more plants grow. The demonization of carbon is not about helping the environment. The New World Order idea has always been to attach the worsening condition of the environment to an individual's energy usage – and even their breathing – so as to introduce a carbon tax. Global government literally wants to tax you for breathing, for merely being alive.
This entire Climate Change Agenda is focused on one reason and one reason only: TAXATION. The whole scheme to get people and corporations fixated on their carbon footprint, rather than how much actual benefit or harm they are doing to the environment is to pave the way for more taxation and centralization of power. To have a worldwide carbon tax you need a One World Government to enforce and collect it. The UN, International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) and its other subdivisions are constantly talking about global governance for this very reason. In this context, “global governance” means centralizing vast amounts of power into a body destined to become the World Government, under the pretext of fighting anthropomorphic global warming and climate change. It also means extending the reach of the United Nations so that local bodies such as local councils and municipalities that belong to the ICLEI can implement its global directives and make it look like it was locally decided. The Cap-and-Trade scheme was already being discussed in the 1980s, so a carbon tax is not a new idea.
Many climate change activists such as the BBC's climate change propagandist David Attenborough believe the planet is over populated. There can be no doubt that rising populations can put a strain on resources, yet where is the proof that this planet cannot support 7 billion, 9 billion, 20 billion people? Is it really population that is the problem, or is it rather self-centered greed and destructive environmental practices and technologies? Can we not stimulate better modes of efficiency, in resource sharing and development and release of technologies suppressed because they go against the established order? Also, it has been known in many countries for a long time that as you increase education, you decrease population, naturally. There is no need for stealth sterilization programs, introducing contraceptives through vaccines or other depopulation murder programs. When people gain a higher education, they organically choose to have less children. If the conspirators really cared about the planet's population, why not use their money to help everyone access better education? Underpinning the propaganda of overpopulation is eugenics. It's the idea that some humans are superior to others, and that some humans don't deserve to be here. This is really the philosophical and spiritual basis of the hijacking. As they have confessed, the conspirators in their delusions view the rest of the population as a virus that must be rid from the planet.
A few days ago HR 2232: Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015 entered Congress. This bill is essentially a national version of the SB277 mandatory vaccination legislation which passed in California earlier this year, with the same impossible exemption requirements. The bill, as currently written, would require all state public schools across the nation to mandate blanket vaccination of their enrolled students in order to receive their federal aid money.
The problem with the New World Order is not just about Climate Change. We have fracking destroying water aquifers. We also have GMOs, food additives, eugenics vaccinations, geoengineering, EMFs, radiation leaking into the oceans from damaged nuclear plants, oil being extracted around the world and being leaked into the environment, companies poisoning rivers with toxic sludge and much more we should be focused on stopping.
Around the world there have been tests of the global carbon tax, already being tested in several countries around the world including: British Columbia, Ireland, Australia, Chile, Sweden, Finland, Great Britain, New Zealand, Quebec and Canada. Please visit the Carbon Tax website for information about what is already happening. It will be global and you will be paying it. As I have already stated. The Elite want to use the global carbon tax to fund Global Government and the Sustainable Development Agenda. According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change there will be Climate Finance, which refers to local, national or transnational financing, which may be drawn from public, private and alternative sources of financing. They are clever not to mention a tax. However, they do use the wording ‘contribution', if a country were to provide funds for climate financing, then this would come in the form of a stealth taxation and although the UN climate chief is skeptical about a global carbon tax, he did say national taxes were possible and laws to cap emissions were good for business. A collective national tax sent to a global central government would equal a global carbon tax and cap-and-trade would work for business like it has for years.
According to the ICLEI, by 2050 two-thirds of all humans will be living in cities. As I have discussed in my article ‘2015 Development Agenda – The New World Incarnate‘, people will be racked and stacked in mega-cities whilst the rest of the planet will be a no-go area. Propaganda through the media including films that portray a post-apocalyptic future such as the Hunger Games are really being laid out for our future.
As Pastor Williams has said for years, watch for the “Buzz Words”. When the Paris terror attacks happened the first thing I did was look for who profits from this event? Why Paris? Why Now? Question everything because your life and your liberty depend on it!